A la défense des chrétiens persécutés
***********
Pour attirer l’attention du monde sur leur condition, en particulier au Moyen-Orient, il ne pas trop compter sur le Pape, puisque pour lui, toutes les religions se valent, et le « prochain », c’est avant tout le lointain. Mais deux leaders de l’Est, plutôt mal vus des « pouvoirs forts », rejoints par l’administration Trump, ne craignent pas de s’exposer, et de s’engager concrètement. Ils s’appellent Vladimir Poutine, et Viktor Orban.
***********
Mon mépris pour ce pape grandit de jour en jour.
Mais il n'est pas le seul à mériter un cinglant mépris : la mission historique de la France en Orient, depuis des siècles, depuis les croisades, c'est-à-dire la bagatelle de 900 ans, est d'y protéger les chrétiens.
Où est le gouvernement français sur ce sujet ? C'est à pleurer de honte.
Vraiment, nous avons bien mérité que Notre Dame de Paris brûle sous Macron 1er.
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Viktor Orban. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Viktor Orban. Afficher tous les articles
lundi, décembre 09, 2019
samedi, juillet 30, 2016
Ah, si je pouvais voter Orban ...
Hungary Blasts EU with Common Sense on Muslim Migration
In “an astonishingly savage tirade”—to quote from the UK’s Express—Hungary’s Prime Minister Victor Orban recently tore into the European Union “over migration and taunted Angela Merkel for failing to protect German people from Islamist terror.”
(Click here to learn why central and eastern European nations, Hungary chief among them, are wary of Islam.)
In the course of his speech, Orban made two important points that I habitually make, and which explain the true reasons behind the unprecedented rise of terrorism in EU nations: 1)Islam’s Rule of Numbers; 2) Western enablement of Islam.
In regards to the first point, Orban
issued a stunning rebuke to Mrs Merkel on migration, blaming recent terror attacks on the mas[s] influx of refugees… Migration, he argued, “increases terrorism and crime” and “destroys national culture” in a thinly-veiled swipe at Mrs Merkel’s decision to roll out the red carpet to millions of people from the Middle East.
This is as simple as it gets. Over three years ago, in May 2013, a Muslim man decapitated a British solider with a meat cleaver in the middle of a busy London street. I explained it as follows:
It reflects what I call “Islam’s Rule of Numbers,” a rule that expresses itself with remarkable consistency: The more Muslims grow in numbers, the more Islamic phenomena intrinsic to the Muslim world—in this case, brazen violence against “infidels”—appear….
Thus as Muslim populations continue growing in Western nations, count on growing, and brazen, numbers of attacks on infidels—beheadings and such.
And so it has been. While EU leaders and Western media scurry to find pretexts to explain the rise of terrorism—from “Muslim grievances” to wars for “money” and “natural resources,” as Pope Francis recently claimed after Muslims slaughtered a priest in France—reality is much simpler: Islam promotes hate for and violence against non-Muslims.
Accordingly, wherever Islam is in power, such as the Muslim world for example, non-Muslims are grossly persecuted—and not just by ISIS, but by “regular Muslims”—from heads of state, to police, to educators, down to the mob.
If Muslims persecute non-Muslims where they are strong, is it any wonder that, as Muslim numbers grow in Europe, as they have in recent times, attacks on non-Muslims grows with them? Or, as Orban put it, Muslim immigration “increases terrorism and crime.”
The Hungarian prime minister’s second important point agrees with another point I’ve been repeatedly making, most recently last week in an article titled, “Eject Western Traitors, Beat Islamic Terrorists”:
Those who seek to reverse this situation [growing Islamic terrorism] must begin by embracing a simple fact: Islam is not terrorizing the West because it can but because it is being allowed to….
Today [as opposed to historically], Muslim terrorists, rapists, and criminals are not entering the West against its will but because of it….
Orban agrees:
We must make it clear that our problem is not in Mecca, but in Brussels [capital of the EU]. The obstacle for us is not Islam, but the bureaucrats in Brussels. We would be able to deal with Islam if we were allowed to deal with it in the way we think we should.
Simply put, whatever Islam is or teaches—whether it is violent or not, whatever it does “over there” in Mecca and elsewhere—is not the immediate problem.
Rather, the immediate problem is that EU “bureaucrats in Brussels” are imposing Islam “over here,” or, as I had more bluntly concluded:
Western policymakers who insist that Islam is peaceful (despite all evidence otherwise) and that the West is “obligated” to receive Muslim migrants, are 100% responsible for the daily victims of jihad, most recently an octogenarian priest…. The war begins with them. Kick them and their suicidal policies out, and watch Islamic terror on Western soil fizzle out.
It’s all very simple: More Muslims equals more violence against non-Muslims. This formula acknowledges that not all Muslims, or even the majority, are inclined to acts of terrorism. However, as Muslim numbers grow in general, it’s only natural that the numbers of “radicals” grow with them (e.g., 10 % of 100 is only 10, but 10% of a 1,000 is 100).
And the immediate issue isn’t whether or why Islam is violent; the immediate issue is that Western leaders are the ones enabling and importing it into the West.
It still remains to be seen if Orban is right “that other European nations would come around to Hungary’s no-nonsense way of thinking as the reality of regular terror attacks set in.”
In “an astonishingly savage tirade”—to quote from the UK’s Express—Hungary’s Prime Minister Victor Orban recently tore into the European Union “over migration and taunted Angela Merkel for failing to protect German people from Islamist terror.”
(Click here to learn why central and eastern European nations, Hungary chief among them, are wary of Islam.)
In the course of his speech, Orban made two important points that I habitually make, and which explain the true reasons behind the unprecedented rise of terrorism in EU nations: 1)Islam’s Rule of Numbers; 2) Western enablement of Islam.
In regards to the first point, Orban
issued a stunning rebuke to Mrs Merkel on migration, blaming recent terror attacks on the mas[s] influx of refugees… Migration, he argued, “increases terrorism and crime” and “destroys national culture” in a thinly-veiled swipe at Mrs Merkel’s decision to roll out the red carpet to millions of people from the Middle East.
This is as simple as it gets. Over three years ago, in May 2013, a Muslim man decapitated a British solider with a meat cleaver in the middle of a busy London street. I explained it as follows:
It reflects what I call “Islam’s Rule of Numbers,” a rule that expresses itself with remarkable consistency: The more Muslims grow in numbers, the more Islamic phenomena intrinsic to the Muslim world—in this case, brazen violence against “infidels”—appear….Thus as Muslim populations continue growing in Western nations, count on growing, and brazen, numbers of attacks on infidels—beheadings and such.
And so it has been. While EU leaders and Western media scurry to find pretexts to explain the rise of terrorism—from “Muslim grievances” to wars for “money” and “natural resources,” as Pope Francis recently claimed after Muslims slaughtered a priest in France—reality is much simpler: Islam promotes hate for and violence against non-Muslims.
Accordingly, wherever Islam is in power, such as the Muslim world for example, non-Muslims are grossly persecuted—and not just by ISIS, but by “regular Muslims”—from heads of state, to police, to educators, down to the mob.
If Muslims persecute non-Muslims where they are strong, is it any wonder that, as Muslim numbers grow in Europe, as they have in recent times, attacks on non-Muslims grows with them? Or, as Orban put it, Muslim immigration “increases terrorism and crime.”
The Hungarian prime minister’s second important point agrees with another point I’ve been repeatedly making, most recently last week in an article titled, “Eject Western Traitors, Beat Islamic Terrorists”:
Those who seek to reverse this situation [growing Islamic terrorism] must begin by embracing a simple fact: Islam is not terrorizing the West because it can but because it is being allowed to….Today [as opposed to historically], Muslim terrorists, rapists, and criminals are not entering the West against its will but because of it….
Orban agrees:
We must make it clear that our problem is not in Mecca, but in Brussels [capital of the EU]. The obstacle for us is not Islam, but the bureaucrats in Brussels. We would be able to deal with Islam if we were allowed to deal with it in the way we think we should.
Simply put, whatever Islam is or teaches—whether it is violent or not, whatever it does “over there” in Mecca and elsewhere—is not the immediate problem.
Rather, the immediate problem is that EU “bureaucrats in Brussels” are imposing Islam “over here,” or, as I had more bluntly concluded:
Western policymakers who insist that Islam is peaceful (despite all evidence otherwise) and that the West is “obligated” to receive Muslim migrants, are 100% responsible for the daily victims of jihad, most recently an octogenarian priest…. The war begins with them. Kick them and their suicidal policies out, and watch Islamic terror on Western soil fizzle out.
It’s all very simple: More Muslims equals more violence against non-Muslims. This formula acknowledges that not all Muslims, or even the majority, are inclined to acts of terrorism. However, as Muslim numbers grow in general, it’s only natural that the numbers of “radicals” grow with them (e.g., 10 % of 100 is only 10, but 10% of a 1,000 is 100).
And the immediate issue isn’t whether or why Islam is violent; the immediate issue is that Western leaders are the ones enabling and importing it into the West.
It still remains to be seen if Orban is right “that other European nations would come around to Hungary’s no-nonsense way of thinking as the reality of regular terror attacks set in.”
jeudi, septembre 17, 2015
Viktor Orban : «Discuter de quotas aujourd'hui, c'est une invitation pour les migrants»
Viktor Orban : «Discuter de quotas aujourd'hui, c'est une invitation pour les migrants»
C'est clair, c'est net, ancré dans le réel, avec de vrais êtres humains. Ca change des fumisteries vaporeuses («devoir moral»,«terre d'asile» etc.) des gauchistes destinées à nous enculer.
******************
J'ai aimé quand la chancelière a dit, il y a environ un an et demi, que le multiculturalisme était mort. Car la menace du terrorisme est une chose. Mais il y a aussi le défi de l'intégration de ces musulmans. En Europe, elle ne s'est pas faite : des sociétés parallèles vivent les unes à côté des autres. Je ne dénie pas à une nation le droit de fonctionner de telle façon. Mais nous, en Hongrie, nous ne voulons pas suivre cette voie. Les musulmans ont une approche de la vie tout à fait différente de la nôtre. Et face à eux, nous ne sommes pas du tout compétitifs. Si nous, chrétiens, laissons les musulmans rivaliser avec nous sur le continent, nous serons surpassés en nombre, c'est mathématique. Quant aux positions du pape François(qui a demandé à chaque paroisse d'accueillir une famille), je les respecte. Mais en tant que protestant, je suis de ceux qui pensent qu'il n'est pas infaillible.
Cette crise des migrants pourrait-elle être fatale à l'UE ?
Cela pourrait arriver. Mais pour l'instant, c'est encore gérable. Il faut simplement arrêter les questions philosophiques et passer aux questions pratiques.
******************
Nota : l'expression «devoir moral» est typique de ces expressions creuses et ampoulées des gauchistes. Quelqu'un peut-il m'expliquer ce qu'est un devoir immoral ? Un devoir est un devoir, point barre. C'est comme la musique et la justice : quand on se sent obliger de rajouter des épithètes, ça pue l'arnaque.
Addendum :
Michèle Tribalat : «Le terrain moral permet d'esquiver le débat»
C'est clair, c'est net, ancré dans le réel, avec de vrais êtres humains. Ca change des fumisteries vaporeuses («devoir moral»,«terre d'asile» etc.) des gauchistes destinées à nous enculer.
******************
J'ai aimé quand la chancelière a dit, il y a environ un an et demi, que le multiculturalisme était mort. Car la menace du terrorisme est une chose. Mais il y a aussi le défi de l'intégration de ces musulmans. En Europe, elle ne s'est pas faite : des sociétés parallèles vivent les unes à côté des autres. Je ne dénie pas à une nation le droit de fonctionner de telle façon. Mais nous, en Hongrie, nous ne voulons pas suivre cette voie. Les musulmans ont une approche de la vie tout à fait différente de la nôtre. Et face à eux, nous ne sommes pas du tout compétitifs. Si nous, chrétiens, laissons les musulmans rivaliser avec nous sur le continent, nous serons surpassés en nombre, c'est mathématique. Quant aux positions du pape François(qui a demandé à chaque paroisse d'accueillir une famille), je les respecte. Mais en tant que protestant, je suis de ceux qui pensent qu'il n'est pas infaillible.
Cette crise des migrants pourrait-elle être fatale à l'UE ?
Cela pourrait arriver. Mais pour l'instant, c'est encore gérable. Il faut simplement arrêter les questions philosophiques et passer aux questions pratiques.
******************
Nota : l'expression «devoir moral» est typique de ces expressions creuses et ampoulées des gauchistes. Quelqu'un peut-il m'expliquer ce qu'est un devoir immoral ? Un devoir est un devoir, point barre. C'est comme la musique et la justice : quand on se sent obliger de rajouter des épithètes, ça pue l'arnaque.
Addendum :
Michèle Tribalat : «Le terrain moral permet d'esquiver le débat»
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)
